No-Spin’s Study Overview

Large, high-quality RCT of Bottom Line, a program providing intensive advising to students from low-income backgrounds to help them get into and graduate from college, finds a $3,661 (8%) increase in earnings 8-9 years after random assignment. There was no detectable impact on employment, the study’s other main outcome. A longer-term follow-up measuring effects 10 years after random assignment is forthcoming.

Program:

  • Bottom Line is “an intensive college advising program that works with low-income and first generation students, beginning in high school and, for many students, continuing through college. Advisors help students identify well-matched, higher-quality colleges, complete applications and financial aid forms, and navigate the transition to college.”

Study Design:

  • The study sample comprised 2,422 eligible high school students in New York City, Boston, and Worcester, MA, who were randomly assigned to participate in Bottom Line (treatment) or receive usual services (control).
  • The average household income of these students was approximately $23,000. 70% were female, 64% were Black or Hispanic, and 81% were children whose parents had not attended college.
  • Based on our review criteria, this was a well-conducted RCT.

Findings:

  • In 2024, when participants were either 8 or 9 years post random assignment, the study found a statistically significant 8% ($3,661) increase in earnings. On average, treatment group members earned $50,731, compared to the $47,070 earned by control members.
  • There was no detectable impact on employment – the study’s second main outcome (88.4% T vs. 85.7% C).
  • These findings build on previous study follow-ups, which found that Bottom Line produced a 7.6 percentage point increase in the likelihood of earning a bachelor’s degree five years after high school graduation.

Comment:

  • Disclosure: Arnold Ventures, which funds the No-Spin Evidence Review, funded the Bottom Line RCT.

Click or tap a highlight to see No-Spin’s comment